Monday, January 14, 2013

SUPREME COURT to Hear Case on Obama's Alleged Forged Documents


.
Post  Bulldog75 Today at 12:00 am
On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court scheduled a birther case brought on by Orly Taitz which calls into question Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to be president of the United States. Dr. Taitz, a lawyer from Santa Margarita, Calif., also made the announcement on her website on Jan. 9.

As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court's decision to review Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories. The case is identified as Edward Noonan, et al., v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State.


On Feb. 15, all nine justices will gather in conference to review whether Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief. Edward Noonan, et al., contend that if Obama had been ineligible to run in 2008, other Democratic candidates should have replaced him on the presidential ballot.

The Supreme Court's website shows that docket file no. 12A606 was originally denied by Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Reagan appointee, on Dec. 13. On Jan. 9, Chief Justice Roberts sent Dr. Taitz's application to the full court for a review scheduled for Feb. 15.

Despite the lack of exposure from the mainstream media, the issue appears to have gained some steam among conservative bloggers. On Jan. 9, New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi suggested that the president's nominee to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, may have played a role in removing birther evidence from Barack Obama's passport records.

It appears that in 2008, a State Department insider was simultaneously employed by Analysis Corporation of McLean, Va. (then headed by Mr. Brennan) and was reprimanded for accessing (and possibly altering) Obama's passport records.

On Wednesday, Dr. Orly Taitz, who represents the birther cause, posted the following on her website:

The case . . . provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

The Supreme Court reviews about 10,000 petitions annually in regular conferences. About 100 are selected for further judicial consideration. In this filtering process, the votes of four justices are needed to advance a case. On her website, Dr. Taitz argues that Obama has used false identification, an alias, a fake Social Security number, forged birth certificates and Selective Service applications. [ See a comparison of a regular birth certificate versus one submitted by Barack Obama in this photo. ]

Among the aliases Obama allegedly used are Barry Soetoro (used while teaching law at the University of Chicago) and Harrison J. Bounel. Birthers contend that by entering Obama's claimed Social Security number (042-68-4425) into background check systems, the name Harrison J. Bounel shows up in search results. Forgery of government documents is considered a felony.

This is not the first time that Obama has had to contend with the birther issue. On Aug. 21 2008, Philip J. Berg, a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, brought a federal lawsuit challenging the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to become president. Berg alleged that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and that the "Certification of Live Birth" on Obama's website is a forgery.

The lower federal court dismissed the complaint as "unworthy of further discussion". Soon after, Berg filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court which was denied by Justice David Souter in Nov. 2008. A second petition was denied by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

A third petition was referred to the Supreme Court by Justice Antonin Scalia. However, the high court rejected the writ of certiorari on Jan. 12, 2009, just eight days away from Obama's first inauguration as the nation's 44th chief executive.

A team of forensic experts organized by Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio have looked into Obama's birth certificate. In July 2012, Arpaio told Fox News his team's conclusion that Obama's birth certification is "definitely fraudulent". After months of investigation, his forensic investigators had discovered code errors, computer-generated marks, and manipulated seals on the document.

In April 2011, the White House retracted the Hawaii certificate and replaced it with a long form version. Around the same time, business tycoon Donald Trump sent a team of investigators to the state of Hawaii to question Obama's real place of birth.

Said Trump:

He [Obama] spent $2 million in legal fees trying on to get away from this issue, and if it weren't an issue, why wouldn't he just solve it? I wish he would because if he doesn't, it's one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and in the history, period. You are not allowed to be a president if you're not born in this country. Right now, I have real doubts.

The issue gained steam in the midst of a highly contentious election year as Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney gained favor among the voting public. In May 2012, the president's former literary agent Acton & Dystel produced a previously unpublished leaflet stating that Obama was "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii". The promotional booklet was written in 1991 when Obama was at Harvard Law School. It was intended to be part of an Obama autobiography but the project was cancelled.

In Oct. 2012, just days before November presidential elections, Mr. Trump offered to donate $5 million to Obama's chosen charity if the commander-in-chief would disclose his college and passport records. Trump had hoped that the disclosures would shed light on where Barack Obama was born, his citizenship status, and whether or not he was admitted to college and law school as a foreign exchange student. President Obama ignored Trump's challenge in media interviews and refused to release the requested records.

However, comedian Bill Maher did issue a challenge to Mr. Trump to produce his birth certificate in exchange for $5 million donated to the latter's favorite charity. Maher made the offer on Jan. 7 on "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno". On Tuesday, the real estate tycoon produced a birth certificate showing that he was born in New York City. Trump's lawyer then issued a letter asking the HBO host to make good on his $5 million offer.

Attached hereto is a copy of Mr. Trump's birth certificate, demonstrating that he is the son of Fred Trump, not an orangutan. Please remit the $5 million to Mr. Trump immediately and he will ensure that the money be donated to the following five charities in equal amounts: Hurricane Sandy Victims, The Police Athletic League, The American Cancer Society, The March of Dimes, and The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

http://www.examiner.com/article/supreme-court-to-hear-case-on-obama-s-alleged-forged-documents

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OUR FOREFATHERS AND THE IDIOTS WE HAVE IN GOV TODAY....
TODAY WE LOOK AT AND LOOK AT TONS AND TONS AND TONS AND TONS OF EVIDENCE. WE SHOW IT TO EVERYONE ON THE PLANET, AND THE WHOLE WORLD GETS IT EXCEPT THE...... S T U P I D......SIT ON THE ARSE AMERICAN GAME PLAYING, BEER DRINKING USA CITIZENS. THEN WE PUT AHO'S LIKE THE USURPER IN FRONT OF THE CABAL COURT AND NOTHING WILL GET DONE....
FOREFATHERS WOULD SIMPLY GO GET THE SOB AND HANG HIM.... END OF PROBLEM. THIS WHOLE THING IS A MEDIA FARSE, AND NOTHING WILL HAPPEN.

Anonymous said...

I think the communist bitch Obummer placed in the court should recuse her self. This situation certainly qualifies according to the B.A.R. regs.

Anonymous said...

Several important things to consider with this hearing on BO's documents. (1) BO is an employee of a private corporation put in place in 1871 by a then traitorous congress via the Act of 1871. This Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Check all you receive, including your name on your SS card and birth certificate, letters from the IRS, debt collection letters, etc. and you will see the corporation name and YOUR name in ALL CAPS. Since then there has never been an honest election in this nation. The ‘president’ is an employee of this corporation, and is selected and placed in the office of 'president' by those running that private corporation. It matters not where the man was born when 'hired' by a private corporation; (2) those in the Supreme Court as well as Congress also work for that private corporation, established in 1871. Can we honestly expect fellow employees, though in ‘sister’ corporations under the head corporation known as THE UNITED STATES, to rule against a fellow employee, the president of their corporation, especially when it makes no difference where he was born?

Conclusion: It is VERY doubtful that anything that would benefit the people of the over ridden Republic of the United States of America will be ruled as a result of this hearing by the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES against its own ‘PRESIDENT,’ BO.

The people of this nation continue to be deceived and continue to allow it to occur over and over due to their refusal to do their homework and learn the FACTS, the TRUTH, for themselves.

http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm

Anonymous said...

This will be nothing but a dog and pony show they are doing this to put Orly in her place this is a sad sad sad day in America because on Tuesday the Obozo will attack our 2nd amendment rights through executive order and the yellow bellies in Congress and the Senate will not do a damn thing and we can forget about the Supreme Court doing anything but a "show" if there was going to be anything to come of this you can bet at least FOX would have something to say about it if nothing else than to bash Orly. That poor lady has balls of steel while our congress has balls of mush!

Anonymous said...

If they hadn't done away with the original 13th amendment, they would all be disqualified.

Anonymous said...

I just checked, and 2/15/2013 is listed as a "Conference Day". (?)

Anonymous said...

all anyone can do is pray that john roberts does what is right.but remeber obama just got a unconstitutional for what he did but obama said the un gave him the right. hummm i thought this was the usa. maybe roberts will do what is right.

Anonymous said...

I am not sure if anything will become of this. But for america it would be a start to get on the right track.Will we have to deal with Joe Biden the man surely has dementia he thinks he is already the president and can't remember what state he is in.Our whole government seems to be corrupt.We need to get our freedom back that is for sure.