Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Darrell Frech: "Civics Lesson"


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Darrell Frech: "Civics Lesson"
Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 30-Jan-2013 00:06:42

(Thanks, M. :)
Reader M. forwards to us:
***************************************************************************

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Darrell Frech
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:25 AM
Subject: Fw: Civics Lesson






Michelle : Do you think you could forward this message to Rmn-hobie? Darrell
Subject: Civics Lesson





Civics is the study of the theoretical and practical aspects of citizenship, its rights and duties; the duties of citizens to each other as members of a political body and to the government.[1] It includes the study of civil law and civil code, and the study of government with attention to the role
of citizens ― as opposed to external factors ― in the operation and oversight of government.


A forwarded message of a forwarded message to a few who might understand it

Original publication date: Tuesday, August 21, 2012





Forwarded: Monday, January 28, 2013 3:11 PM
Subject: 
PROOF: “BAR” attorneys are AGENTS of a FOREIGN power and most of them KNOW it.

ATTENTION ALL ATTORNEYS “AT” (against) LAW: You can either cease and desist now – or face the wrath of the now stirring masses when they come to full consciousness! Judgment day is coming!

THE BARCARD AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; “The practice of law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State.” (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239) The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!” (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S. W. 720 (1925)).

The “CERTIFICATE” from the State Supreme Court ONLY authorizes, to practice Law “IN COURTS” as a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT, and the holders of these “certificates” can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT, INFANTS, PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.)

The “STATE BAR” CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!! It is a “UNION DUES CARD”. The “BAR” is a “PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION.” 1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union etc. 2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE. Therefore, the “STATE BAR” card is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.

Therefore, the State Bar is: an Unconstitutional Monopoly; AN ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, and, as such, Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the U. S. Constitution.

There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of the Legislative, Judicial or Executive branches within a state as the BAR I attempting to do. “BAR” members have invaded all branches of government, and are attempting to control de jure governments as agents of a foreign entity!

It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of America. The American Bar is an offshoot from the London Lawyers’ Guild, and was established by people with invasive monopolistic goals in mind. In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois, and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the “ABA”, could practice law, and hold all the key positions in law enforcement, and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state, and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America.

The “BAR ASSOCIATION” then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by it by laws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927, and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930’s to join when the treasonous Act became DE FACTO and the Citizens became captives.

Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class. This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right, and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws. The Constitution was written in plain English, and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress of how each law should be used, and the opinions various Judges as the codes list. Any normal person can read the Constitution and the Statutes and understand them without any trouble.

The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction of the Bar Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations. They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examination, and selects the students they will accept in their organization, and issues them so-called license, but keeps the fees for themselves

The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships, and various other offices in the State. Only the Bar Association, or their designated committees, can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar. On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee’s, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot.

This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITE of independent States of We the People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers. This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state. The only recourse if through this initiative process, and vote by the people. After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty, and the blue bloods of Europe.” The American people must stop thinking that
lawyers are better than they are, and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America.

Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. Corporations” are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people, and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO PORWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM.

The U. S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN form of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public officer or branch of government be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES, and NOT Republics. Also the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only. All other people are limited to only two (2) branches of government, and even then, to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class citizens. When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES (Art. IV, paragraph 4) we the people will NEVER rule against themselves. In these unconstitutional
foreign tribunal “courts” (hoodlum centers), men in black dresses that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Art. 1, paragraphs 9 and 10) dispense a perverted ideology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms).

The Legislative Branch of Government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders to the people, as a “fiction court” or a “court/corporation for profit and gain” cannot reach parity with a lawful man. Only Presidents and Governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and layer-judges are unconstitutional granting PARDONS with “immunity from prosecution.”

Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures, etc. This is Unconstitutional “lawyer system,” only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the fiction/for profit and gain courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is a “Bill of Attainder” NOT permitted under the U. S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10).

The U. S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to ASSISTANCE of counsel, and this can be anyone the ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION

LAWYERS & LAWYER-JUDGES created Unconstitutional “lawyer system” pre-trial “motions” and “Hearings” to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigation’s which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U. S. Constitution, (Art. 1earings to have eternam EXTORTIONISTIC

As this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS. When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX, and a PAY-OFF; as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY, NOT BY ANY “TECHNICALITY”.

Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case, directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL. Also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because “OFFICERS” OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH.

These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law; Constitution or Justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS.

CASE “LAW” IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE CASE “LAW” IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either “Yes” or “No”. The lawyer judge also tampers, fixes and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he “rules” certain evidence and/or the truth to be inadmissible.

This makes the trial and transcript FIXED AND RIGGED because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH AND ALL OF THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (article 1, Sections 9 & 10).

“Officer of the Court” Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government, but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only two of the three branches of government. Lawyers, as 1st class citizens, can be elected or hired to any of the three branches of government.

“Lawyers” as “Officers of the Court” Lawyers in the Judicial Branch are unconstitutionally in two branches of government at the SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or the legislative branches of government. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws. District attorneys and State’s attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the Grand Juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms, by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.

The U. S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper, and we would have millions of interpretation (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U. S. Constitution, not interpret it,

Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS, ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or fifty (50) years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions, and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional “lawyer system”. In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone’s will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (usually a child molesting faggot) for EACH CHILD, AND, AT TIMES, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate.

An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX “MONEY” is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County/City/Borough Boards, school boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL o these agencies are “TRICKED” & “FORCED” into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.

In the states of Alaska and Hawaii, the Bar Associations have mandated that all judges are to be licensed to practice law (e. g. Alaska Constitution, Art. IV, Section 4). This license requirement is not found in any other state of the Union. As all licenses to practice law in the states of Alaska and Hawaii are issued by a judge, what judge is qualified to issue a license to practice law to another judge? As only members of the Bar may be licensed to practice law (e.g. A.L.)* 08.08. 020). Alaska and Hawaii judges are REQUIRED to be members of the BAR, and, as such, they are prejudiced to do the business of the Bar. If a judge is required to be a member of the Bar, who disqualifies the judge from office if that judge does not pay the dues or violates the rules of the Bar? Every state in the Union (with the exception of
Alaska and Hawaii) prohibits judges from holding licenses to practice law.

Credit to: I am TDC Katman. ARR. LSS

International Freedom Foundation


poorrichards-blog.blogspot.com/.../proof-bar-attorneys-are-agents-of...Cached

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Aug 21, 2012 – Credit to: I am TDCKatmanARRLSS. International Freedom Foundation http:// www.iff -ifoundfreedom.com. Posted by poorrichard at 9:01
AM
 ...


damitmanwhatsupwiththat.blogspot.com/.../chapter-13-mandamus.ht...Cached

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

May 3, 2012 – Date: Tuesday, 21-Aug-2012 17:10:59. Found this at poorrichards blog http:// poorrichards-blog.blogspot.ca/ ******* TDCKatmanARRLSS.



You +1'd this publicly. Undo

1 post - 1 author - Dec 8, 2011

I am TDCKatmanARRLSS. International Freedom Foundation http://www.iff/ - ifoundfreedom.com. Willful blindness & ignorance of the law is
a
 ...




You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Sep 25, 2012 – I am TDCKatmanARRLSS. International Freedom Foundation http://www.iff/ -
ifoundfreedom.com. Willful blindness & ignorance of the law is a
 ...


winterpatriot.com/aggregator/bluegal-aka-fran/john.../void(0)?...

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Aug 21, 2012 – TDCKatmanARRLSS.International Freedom Foundation ATTENTION ALL ATTORNEY'S "AT" [against] LAW: You can either cease and ...

6. [DOC]


midnightthinktank.com/.../MTT-US-Supreme-Court-in-Massichusetts...

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

File Format: Microsoft Word - Quick View
I am 
TDCKatmanARRLSS. International Freedom Foundation http://www.iff/ - ifoundfreedom.com. Willful blindness & ignorance of the law is a just cause of ...

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

1913 DefinitionCivic (civic)
a. (?)
Civ"ic
[L.civicus, fr. civis citizen. See City.]

1.Relating to, or derived from, a city or citizen; relating to man as a member of society, or to civil affairs.
Civic crown (Rom. Antiq.), a crown or garland of oak leaves and acorns, bestowed on a soldier who had saved the life of a citizen in battle.

------------------------------------------------
When I was studying for my doctorate we were not allowed to use the Wilkipedia for anything because "anyone" can post anything on it, which means it is vulnerable to "personal interpretation". Furthermore, if a word has a "legal" definition I would run as fast as I could from it. The "BAR" perverted our words for their own gain. I check every word's definition against the 1828 Webster's Dictionary for its original meaning.
michiganfreedejurestate.us/1828dictionary.html